Environmentalism for a small planet

The environmental movement has morphed steadily into the climate change movement... that means that Greens are no longer strictly the defenders of natural systems against the incursions of civilization; now they're the defenders of civilization as well.

- from Whole Earth Discipline by Stewart Brand
Home Homeworld Archaeology Resources Indigenousness Lexicon Site Map

Assessing life-support aboard Spaceship Earth
The renowned 20th century futurist, R Buckminster Fuller envisioned our home world as essentially a transport vehicle, accompanying the Sun on a voyage to “parts unknown,” traveling across the universe. He named this vessel “Spaceship Earth.” Another eminent 20th century thinker, chemist James Lovelock, envisioned earth as an integrated and self-regulating (sentient) system that adapts and maintains the suitable conditions for life on our planet. He named this entity “Gaia.” It is in the blending of these two visions of Earth that EcoTek proceeds.

The diameter of our Earth is a mere 7,926 miles... contrasted with our solar system... with a diameter of 2,790,000,000 miles... Earth is but a speck of air, water, fire and soil in the vastness of space. Our solar system, in turn, is but a speck compared to the Milky Way galaxy... which is but a freckle on the face of universe. However... to the flora and fauna on Earth... this planet is a vast, incredibly complex system of interdependent processes of life. The geologic/biodiversity upon and within our planet is nothing short of a miracle. As stated above, a useful analogy is Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis in which Earth is seen as a living organism.

Deep Spirit/Ecology
EcoTek is an ecological and environmental philosophy promoting the inherent worth of all living beings, all flora and fauna aboard Spaceship Earth... regardless of their perceived utility to human need. Our living, sentient environment, our all-inclusive yet fragile ecosphere must be respected and regarded as having certain inalienable legal and ethical rights to live and flourish, regardless of human endeavor. This entails a radical restructuring of modern human culture in accordance with such ideas. It entails humanity recognizing our symbiotic place within Earthspace...

It is reasonable and fast becoming necessary for earthling humans to actively yet humbly assume the role of  stewards of our small planet. This is so, because it is also reasonable to assume the responsibility that humanity has, through population growth, advanced agriculture practices and fossil fuel consumption, added a slight yet significant burden of greenhouse gases (CO2) to our atmosphere, thereby contributing to our planetary system's current atmospheric irregularity. This does not mean however, that EcoTek subscribes to anthropocentric environmentalism or that humanity should be given any preferential consideration over any other species coexisting on this small planet.

With that said, and from the onset, it is important to understand that any perceived climatic catastrophe, such as global warming, is primarily catastrophic from the perspective of humankind and the artifacts of human civilization. However, many species are impacted by our actions and as such, we must assume responsibility for our part played. We are accountable as stewards, precisely because of our technological success as a species, and for the disruption this success has caused other species. For it is not only and merely humans and our systems that will be adversely disrupted. 

Ultimately, Earth and her evolving systems… her rhythms… will be just fine, thank you very much. Her changing cycles may or may not prove to be hospitable to humans. Regardless of debate over culpability, humanity must return to a symbiosis with the rest of Earth's flora and fauna. This must be done as a survival strategy and as a commitment to all life on spaceship earth.

Again, it is now vital that we all view the future with the eye of an environmentalist so we may ascertain and address our home world's atmospheric imbalance with a goal of planetary climatic equilibrium. For in the end, it is humanity that is dependant upon the Earth, not the other way around.

For clarification on what is considered planetary climatic equilibrium from humanity's perspective... the amount of greenhouse gases in earth's atmosphere is measured and compared to historic levels. These gases are measured in parts per million. Up until 200 years ago, the historic norm was 275 part per million. 350 parts per million is what many scientists, climate experts, and progressive national governments consider to be the safe upper limit for CO2 in our atmosphere. Today, the ratio stands at 390 ppm and rising a little more than 2 ppm annually. Having Exceeded the 350 ppm mark indicates that our planet (and its atmosphere) has gone beyond the point of no return for the old equilibrium. The resulting effects of exceeding this tipping point is collectively referred to as "climate change."

If humanity takes climate change seriously and acts now, we may be able to achieve a new planetary equilibrium and stabilize at around 450 ppm within the next 25 to 50 years. Leveling off at 450 ppm could result in a global temperature rise of only 3.6° F, with a potential large loss of species, more severe storms, floods and droughts, refugees from rising sea levels and other extreme and inhumane consequences. Unfortunately, this is an optimistic scenario.

The two basic strategies that humanity has at its disposal to combat climate change are mitigation and adaptation.

Mitigation is any action taken to permanently eliminate or reduce the long-term risk and hazards of climate change to human life and  property. This would involve altering the activities that contribute to climate change through the application of technology and practices. The primary example would be the immediate cutting back of greenhouse gas emissions. This would require significant discipline on our part, as well as technological innovation.

Adaptation would require a "coming to terms" with climate change and managing its effects. This term refers to the ability of a system to adjust to climate change (including climate variability and extremes) to moderate potential damage, to take advantage of opportunities, or to cope with the consequences. Adaptation pertains to how we react to climate change and what changes we make to deal with it's advancement. One example of adaptation would involve moving coastal populations to higher ground in anticipation of rising sea levels.

The bottom line is that our best scientific hypothesis is little more than a educated guess. We cannot completely fathom the chaotic complexity of our planet's environmental systems. Regardless, humanity must rise to the challenge of climate change. This is perhaps the most definitive opportunity in our lifetime for humanity to come together and collaborate on this global issue... responding on a global scale. If we don't act now... we will be left with only one option... adaptation.

Find pertinent links and resources at the bottom of this page...

Q: What if climate change is a hoax?