Archaeology
is the science that studies
human cultures
through the recovery,
documentation, analysis, and interpretation of material remains
and environmental data, including architecture,
artifacts,
altered or disturbed
geographic features,
ecofacts, and landscapes. Because archaeology's aim is to
understand humankind, it is a
humanistic endeavor. Due to its
analysis of human cultures, it is closely associated with and
often considered a
subset of
Anthropology, which contains the subsets: physical anthropology, cultural anthropology,
and linguistic anthropology.
There is debate as to
what archaeology's goals are. Some goals include the
documentation and explanation of the origins and development of
human cultures, understanding culture history, chronicling
cultural evolution, and studying human behavior and ecology,
for both prehistoric and historic societies.
Archaeologists
are also concerned with the study of methods used in the
discipline, and the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings
underlying the questions archaeologists ask of the past. The tasks of surveying areas in order to find
new sites, excavating sites in order to recover
cultural remains, classification, analysis, and
preservation are all important phases of the
archaeological process.
"Continued
archeological investigations push human civilization’s
timeline to ever earlier dates. 21st century analysis of
artifacts recovered from caves in South Africa reveal that
the residents were carving bone tools, using pigments and
making beads over 44,000 years ago. These early humans even
decorated bone implements with a spiral incision that was
then filled with red-clay pigment. Such adornment suggests a
creative aesthetic.
Archeology is an exceedingly interesting
branch of anthropology, as it seeks to identify
civilizational origins through the study of human artifacts.
However, if the archeologists study ancient burial mounds,
flint shards and bones, it is the anthropologists who study
the socio-cultural aspects of human civilization. For it is
the earliest evidences of abstract thought, such as
decorative craft, art, and especially ceremonial burial
observances and ritual, that mark the true transition to
early human society and cultural permanence.
It was precisely these first observations
of burial rites that mark humanity’s earliest abstractions
of an afterlife, and by extension, the understanding of
spirit and the continuation of spirit after death. Once
humans began to think beyond the confines of a single
lifetime, the conceptions of past, present and future, moved
beyond mere survival considerations. This was the true
inception of culture, mediated religiosity and human
modernity."
- excerpt
from: "Applied
Tek-Gnostics - a Field Guide for the Collective
Conscious"
Biological Anthropology
Synonymous with Physical Anthropology
...this anthropological subset focuses on the study of humans
and non-human primates in their biological, evolutionary, and
demographic dimensions. It is a scientific discipline concerned
with the biological and behavioral aspects of human beings,
their extinct hominin ancestors, and related non-human primates,
particularly from an evolutionary perspective. It examines the
biological and social factors that have affected the evolution
of humans and other primates, and that generate, maintain or
change contemporary genetic and physiological variation.
Cultural
Anthropology
Cultural anthropologists study
cultural variation among humans, collect
observations, usually through participant
observation called fieldwork, which
includes the global discipline of Ethnology, as well as
the study of a specific culture, or Ethnography. Such immersive fieldwork examines the
impact of global economic and political
processes on local cultural realities.
“Culture, or civilization, taken in its
broad, ethnographic sense, is that complex
whole which includes knowledge, belief, art,
morals, law, custom, and any other
capabilities and habits acquired by man or
woman as a member of society.”
- Sir Edward
Tylor
Since humans acquire culture through a
processes of learned behavior and socialization,
people living in different places or different
circumstances develop different cultures.
Anthropologists have also pointed out that
through culture people can adapt to their
environment in non-genetic ways, so people
living in different environments will often have
different cultures. Much of anthropological
theory has originated in an appreciation of and
interest in the tension between the local
(particular cultures) and the global (a
universal human nature, or the web of
connections between people in distinct
places/circumstances).
Linguistic
Anthropology
Not to be confused with anthropological
linguistics, Linguistic Anthropology seeks to understand
the processes of human communications, verbal and
non-verbal,
and the variations in language across time and space. Linguistic
Anthropologists also study the social uses of language and the
relationship between language and culture. It is the branch of
anthropology that brings linguistic methods to bear on
anthropological problems, linking the analysis of linguistic
forms and processes to the interpretation of socio-cultural
processes. Linguistic anthropologists often draw on related
fields including sociolinguistics, pragmatics, cognitive
linguistics, semiotics, discourse analysis, narrative analysis,
and the new discipline of Memetic
Analysis.
Xenoarchaeology Xenoarchaeology (noun) 1. from the Greek xenos, which means "stranger,
alien" and archaeology, "study of ancients." 2. study of past, archaic, alien or
Ancient Astronaut
cultures or artifacts.
An important theoretic field of study within the
Tek-Gnostics archaeology department is the study
of xenoarchaeology.
This discipline is a form of archaeology
concerned with the physical remains of past (but
not necessarily extinct) alien cultures. These
may be found on planets
or satellites, in space,
the asteroid belt, planetary orbit or
Lagrangian points...
as well as at specific (often considered sacred) sites on Earth.
At the fringes of mainstream scientific
inquiry, there is a lively subculture of
enthusiasts who study purported,
extra-terrestrial structures on
the Moon or on the planet Mars. However, the controversial "structures"
(such as the
Face on Mars) are not accepted as more than
natural features by "respectable" scientists.
Mainstream
archaeologists often dismiss such speculation as
Pseudoarchaeology. The idea that prehistoric
and ancient human societies were aided in their
development by intelligent extra-terrestrial
life, is deemed preposterous by such skeptics. In regard to
scientific rigor, mainstream archaeologists point to
the fact that ancient astronaut theorists rely
primarily on circumstantial evidence of ancient art,
craftwork and legend, which they interpret as
depicting extra-terrestrial technologies and/or
contact.
Palaeo-Contact or
ancient astronaut
theories have been propagated by the likes of
French authors Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier
in The Morning of the Magicians (1963),
and Swiss author Erich von Däniken in
Chariots of the Gods? (1968). In
their works, they claim that the Earth was
visited in prehistoric times by extra-terrestrial beings. Central to this theory is the assertion that the myriad
deities from most (if not all) religions... actually
were extra-terrestrial entities, and that their advanced
technologies were interpreted by early human
populations as evidence of the entity's
divinity.
According
to ancient astronaut theorists, the apparently
miraculous achievements of antiquity… such as the
construction of the great pyramids in Egypt and
Central America, the Moai stone heads of Easter
Island and the Nazca lines of Peru… are remnant
examples of this ancient intervention. Per this
theory, all prehistoric knowledge, religion, and
culture either came directly from extraterrestrial
visitors, or were developed as a result of the
influence of a cultural incubator or “mother
culture" of extra-terrestrial origin.
Variations on
the cultural incubator theory hold that there
existed human societies in the ancient past that
were significantly technologically advanced.
These prehistoric cultures, as exemplified by
the legend of Atlantis, either rose and fell, or
have hidden their existence from the rest of
humanity. Such ideas have been propagated by
figures like Graham Hancock in his
Fingerprints of the Gods (1995).
Pseudoarchaeological skepticism has also been
manifest in consideration of Mayanism and the
2012 phenomenon.
Below are pertinent Tek-Gnostics Network Xenoarchaeological
links. Third party
archaeological
links may be found at the bottom of this
webpage.
ET
Cultural Competency
A field guide for effective communication
with off-world visitors...
Ancient Astronaut Theory Are the World’s
Religions Cargo Cults? A three-part series from the
Tek-Gnostics Weblog...
Space Age Satori
Enlightenment is the normal
state of consciousness for a space-faring humanity...
Item: Göbekli Tepe
Göbekli Tepe was first recognized as an
archaeological site during a large-scale survey
project conducted by the Universities of Istanbul
and Chicago in 1963. In his account of work in the
Urfa province, Peter Benedict describes the site as
a cluster of mounds of reddish soil separated by
depressions. The slopes were clustered with flint,
and he described what he thought to be two small
Islamic cemeteries. The impressions of the survey
team are mirrored in early aerial photographs of the
site, taken before excavations started. The
reddish-brown tell with its height of up to 15m and
a diameter of 300 m is the only colorful spot on the
otherwise barren Germuş mountain range.
Situated on the highest point of this geological
feature, Göbekli Tepe is a prominent landmark at the
edge of the Harran plain. The surveyors identified
the materials at Göbekli Tepe as Neolithic, but
missed the importance of the site. Further research
may also not have seemed possible because of the
assumed Islamic graveyards.
Between
1983 and 1991 large scale excavations, in fact
rescue excavations in advance of the construction of
the Atatürk barrage, were under way at another
important Neolithic site in the Urfa region, Nevalı
Çori. Under the direction of Harald Hauptmann, a
Neolithic settlement was excavated that had large
rectangular domestic buildings often similar to
Cayönü´s channeled buildings. However, excavations
revealed also one building (with three construction
phases) that was completely different from anything
known before in the Neolithic of the Near East. Not
only was a large number of monumental stone
sculptures discovered, but the rectangular building
itself had T-or Gamma-shaped pillars running along
the walls, interconnected by a bench, and a pair of
T-shaped pillars in the centre. Due to the
representation of arms and hands, these pillars
could be understood as highly abstracted depictions
of the human body.
Nevalı Çori was finally flooded by the Atatürk
Barrage in 1991. But one of the members of the
excavation team, Klaus Schmidt (1953-2014), wanted
to find out whether there were more settlements like
Nevalı Çori hidden in the Urfa region, with special
buildings and elaborated stone sculpture. In 1994 he
visited all Neolithic sites mentioned in the
literature. Drawing on the experience gained at
Nevalı Çori, Schmidt was able to identify the
‘tombstones’ at Göbekli Tepe as Neolithic
work-pieces and T-shaped pillars.
“October 1994,
the land colored by the evening sun. We walked
through slopy, rather difficult and confusing
terrain, littered with large basalt blocks. No
traces of prehistoric people visible, no walls,
pottery sherds, stone tools. Doubts regarding
the sense of this trip, like many before with
the aim to survey prehistoric, in particular
Stone Age sites, were growing slowly but
inexorably.
Back in the
village, an old man had answered our questions
whether there was a hill with çakmaktaşı, flint,
in vicinity, with a surprisingly clear: Yes!.
And he had sent a boy to guide us to that place.
We could drive only a small part of the way, at
the edge of the basalt field we had to start
walking. Our small group was made up of a taxi
driver from the town, our young guide, Michael
Morsch, a colleague from Heidelberg, and me.
Finally we reached a small hill at the border of
the basalt field, offering a panoramic view of a
wide horizon. Still no archaeological traces,
just those of sheep and goat flocks brought here
to graze. But we had finally reached the end of
the basalt field; now the barren limestone
plateau lay in front of us.
On the opposed
hill a large mound towered above the flat
plateau, divided by depressions into several
hilltops. Was that the mound we were looking
for? The ‘knocks’ of red soil Peter Benedict had
described in his survey report, Göbekli Tepe, or
to be more precise, Göbekli Tepe ziyaret? When
we approached the flanks of the mound, the so
far gray and bare limestone plateau suddenly
began to glitter. A carpet of flint covered the
bedrock, and sparkled in the afternoon sun, not
unlike a snow cover in the winter sun. But this
spectacular sight was not only caused by nature,
humans had assisted in staging it. We assured
ourselves several times: These were not flint
nodules fragmented by the forces of nature, but
flakes, blades and fragments of cores, in short
artifacts.
Other finds, in
particular pottery, were absent. On the flanks
of the mound the density of flint became lower.
We reached the first long-stretched stone heaps,
obviously accumulated here over decades by
farmers clearing their fields […]. One of those
heaps held a particularly large boulder. It was
clearly worked and had a form that was easily
recognizable: it was the T-shaped head of a
pillar of the Nevalı Çori type.”
- Dr Klaus
Schmidt
The above was taken from:
The Tepe Telegrams (News & Notes from the
Göbekli Tepe Research Staff)
“The discovery of Göbekli
Tepe in southeastern Turkey in 1994 has forced
us to rethink the origins of civilization. While
the site is far from fully excavated, we’ve
learned enough to know that it was built well
over 10,000 years ago – the earliest Egyptian
pyramids are closer to us in time than to
Göbekli Tepe. We know that it was huge by all
but modern standards. We know it was a ritual
site, not a place where people lived. And we
know that it was built before the development of
agriculture and settled living.
We’ve always assumed that
after people begin farming, building cities, and
generally settling down, religion evolved from
tribal religion to what would become the
organized religions of Sumer, Babylon, and
Egypt, and eventually into their classical and
modern offshoots. Göbekli Tepe tells us that’s
wrong. Instead, organized religion came first.
Then, because people gathered together, they
began looking for ways to feed everyone.
Necessity was the mother of the invention of
agriculture… and of brewing. Göbekli Tepe has
our first evidence of large-scale beer
production.”
- John Beckett - from a
review of Gordon White's: Star.Ships: A
Prehistory of the Spirits
“The ancient einkorn
wheat, found in the hills surrounding Göbekli
Tepe, just happens to be the single genetic
ancestor of every strain of wheat grown and
eaten across the earth. People gathering at a
temple on a hill to worship ‘heavenly beings’
were like passengers in an airport during a
pandemic. Wheat, and what to do with it, spread
to every corner of the land.”
“The
discoverer of Göbekli Tepe and its chief
excavator, Dr Klaus Schmidt, famously warned
against what he called ‘Holy Land Syndrome,’
which is the propensity for archaeologists to
head out into the field with a spade in one hand
and a Bible in the other. Holy Land Syndrome
precludes the finding of something you didn’t
already expect to find.”
“The
twenty first century offers us a new Holy Land
Syndrome. There is still the spade in one hand,
but the Bible has been replaced with a very
selective reading of ‘On the Origin of Species.’
Science does not consider itself an ideology, as
it claims to only deal with what is real. This
is, of course, what every ideology thinks of
itself.”
- Gordon White, from:
Star.Ships: A Prehistory of the Spirits
At Göbekli
Tepe we can find depictions of creatures like
armadillos, wild boars and geese... animals not
indigenous to the region. What is interesting is
that located less than 350 Miles from Göbekli
Tepe is the site many biblical scholars believe
to be the resting place of Noah’s ark, so the
animal carvings of Gobekli Tepe suggest a time
in the region’s history when the indigenous
animal population may have been of a totally
different anthropological origin. Could Göbekli
Tepe and Noah’s ark be connected in (some) way?
Some
researchers theorize that the events of a
cataclysmic flood and a story similar to that
told of Noah’s ark was recorded on the stone
pillars of Gobekli Tepe. If true, that would
push the date of the great flood back to the end
of the last ice age, far earlier than the
biblical period. There are some incredible
things about this mystical place but we still do
not know the answers to some of the most
important questions like, who built Göbekli Tepe?
to what purpose? and how was Göbekli Tepe
preserved until today?
Researchers
point that Göbekli Tepe was “carefully” placed
underneath the sand, the whole site was actually
buried. Why would the builders bury such an
incredible site? To protect it? to preserve it?
Göbekli Tepe is regarded as an archaeological
discovery of the greatest importance since it
could profoundly change our understanding of a
crucial stage in the development of human
societies. “Göbekli Tepe changes everything,”
says Ian Hodder of Stanford University. David
Lewis-Williams, professor of archaeology at
Witwatersrand University in Johannesburg, says
that: “Göbekli Tepe is the most important
archaeological site in the world.”